sndsgood wrote:as quick said. not to much diffrence then a stimulus package, just one little extra lump sum that gets spend in a weekend on bills and then nothing. lower taxes as a hole would increase spending more. kinda like would you rather have 300 bucks now or an extra 20 bucks a week permanent.
Quote:
because our society has become so instant-gratification
Taetsch Z-24 wrote: The way out will be much harder, and I'm afraid, paved in blood.
Quiklilcav wrote:This encourages growth and spending because people and businesses can see that they will have a sustained increase in their bottom line, not just a one shot deal.If you believe that, then how do you reconcile this line of thinking?
Quote:Spend it too quickly, and you have the same idea as stimulus checks. Spending it slowly tells investors that there is sustained income available. Its still not a permanent increase(yet) but it is better this way than quick spending it all - as demonstrated by your own line of thought concerning stimulus checks.
At a news conference Friday, Republican lawmakers criticized the White House for spending so much, while simultaneously saying the administration wasn't spending it fast enough.
bk3k wrote:Obama rejects 2nd stimulus: Give recovery time
Alright - now everyone start attacking Obama for not rushing directly into another stimulus package. This is Barack HUSSEIN Obama's decision after all so it must be a conspiracy to rob Americans of something...
(Angry mob forms in 5, 4, 3...)
(tabs) wrote:just because he doesnt support a second stimulus doesnt make his passing the first one any better.
J03Y wrote:(tabs) wrote:just because he doesnt support a second stimulus doesnt make his passing the first one any better.
while I agree, we do have to remember GWB started it with his send a check to every retard to go buy some uneeded material item stimulus BS.
sndsgood wrote:J03Y wrote:(tabs) wrote:just because he doesnt support a second stimulus doesnt make his passing the first one any better.
while I agree, we do have to remember GWB started it with his send a check to every retard to go buy some uneeded material item stimulus BS.
he did start it, and it pretty much didnt work. so why keep trying a failed plan?
J03Y wrote:(tabs) wrote:just because he doesnt support a second stimulus doesnt make his passing the first one any better.
while I agree, we do have to remember GWB started it with his send a check to every retard to go buy some uneeded material item stimulus BS.
Quiklilcav wrote:
Lowering taxes causes a behaviour change, because the cost of operating a business drops, which means profitability will go up. This ecourages investment, because businesses and people can see a long term that there will be a payoff for their risk. This is the reason why tax cuts work, and government spending does not. The government can not spend enough to turn the economy around without taking it from the very people they're supposed to be helping. It is when they get out of the process entirely, and keep their hands out of the pockets of the private sector, that real job creation happens.
sndsgood wrote:J03Y wrote:(tabs) wrote:just because he doesnt support a second stimulus doesnt make his passing the first one any better.
while I agree, we do have to remember GWB started it with his send a check to every retard to go buy some uneeded material item stimulus BS.
he did start it, and it pretty much didnt work. so why keep trying a failed plan?
J03Y wrote:They say the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over, while expecting a different outcome...........
Red wrote:doesn't these stimulus packages degrade the american dream? I mean whats the American dream? graduate high school...go to college...graduate with a degree in something useful....use your education and eventually start your own business?
Red wrote:Refresh my memory, but didn't the first stimulus occur in the spring of 07?