Mr. Michael T Drennan wrote: pissed off Muslims don't know anger management.
and pissed off Muslims don't know how to deal with people who do not agree with their principals and their believes
Now, here in america we are allowed to practice any religion as long as they're not terrorising and killing other none believers but many Muslims here in America claim to be "Peaceful Muslims" and I believe many of them are peaceful but remember that guy who wanted to blow that nissan pathfinder in the middle of New York City,
maybe if that guy did burn those books, can you imaging the reaction of all Muslims in New york city?
when they get mad they feel the need to kill a bunch of people at once, so that's the problem
Kevin Trudeau wrote:Quote:
By bringing this up in a thread about unrestrained Christian violence in America, you've now directly compared the USA to Iran and Saudi Arabia in this department. Ouch.
Ummm....he was going to burn books. That is soooooooo violent. You cannot compare book burning, which is protected free speech, with countries like Saudia Arabia who can and do execute people who convert from Islam.....not some nutjob out behind a sand dune, executed by government agencies. F-off Bill.
.
I didn't compare it. YOU did. Look back and understand how you stepped into this pile of defecation, reflect, then offer something more clever than "stfu" and "f-off". That is, if you are capable of doing so...as time goes on, it becomes more and more evident that you are not.
ThatGuy85 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:The General speaks the truth.
Perfect. The General represents all that is well in this country...moderation, understanding, and realistic interpretations of our Constitution that suit ALL people, not just so-called 'patriots'.
spoiler wrote:Mr. Michael T Drennan wrote: pissed off Muslims don't know anger management.
and pissed off Muslims don't know how to deal with people who do not agree with their principals and their believes
Now, here in america we are allowed to practice any religion as long as they're not terrorising and killing other none believers but many Muslims here in America claim to be "Peaceful Muslims" and I believe many of them are peaceful but remember that guy who wanted to blow that nissan pathfinder in the middle of New York City,
maybe if that guy did burn those books, can you imaging the reaction of all Muslims in New york city?
when they get mad they feel the need to kill a bunch of people at once, so that's the problem
ive seen an american get mad and blow up a federal building in oklahoma. ive seen some guy get mad at losing his job shoot up a mall. you can go on and on and on about what "some" people do when they get mad. but there is a diffrence between some, and all. you will alwyas have some peope do bad things.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sndsgood/ https://www.facebook.com/#!/Square1Photography
I like that quote
To bad bill \GT, and the rest of the left dont apply that to the gun laws.
As for the fu-king hoies, if by some you mean all that read the fu-king crayon, yes.
as for turkey, they are by far the most advanced nation over there,
but, but...
Remember The Armenians?
If they are the most advanced, WTF dose that say for the rest of them?
why are we still talking about crayons anyway?
And REMEMBER 11SEP01 at all people? who attacked who?
This site seems very liberal\socialist
hmmm, oh yes it was Winston Churchill that said it best
Quote:
If you're 18 and not a liberal, you have no heart. If you're 40 and not a conservative, you have no brain." -Sir Winston Churchill
So I guess most of you have an excuses...
I however know I do not have a hart.
Chris
"An appeal to arms and the God of hosts is all that is left us. But we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God that presides over the destinies of nations. The battle sir, is not of the strong alone. Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death."
Speech at the Second Virginia Convention at St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia (23 March 1775) Patrick Henry
INFIDEL wrote:...And REMEMBER 11SEP01 at all people? who attacked who?...
Chris
Osama Bin Laden's radical extremists Al-Qaeda attacked us not any country or Islamists in general. If you remember many Islam nations denounced the attacks and even Saddam Hussein himself called the attacks cowardly although knowing that psycho he was probably jumping for joy when he first got word of it.
And the terrorist came from what country?
Chris
"An appeal to arms and the God of hosts is all that is left us. But we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God that presides over the destinies of nations. The battle sir, is not of the strong alone. Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death."
Speech at the Second Virginia Convention at St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia (23 March 1775) Patrick Henry
Wow, hand-holding! Somehow, that seems even more demeaning to a President than a courteous bow...but hey, that's just me.
I also recall the Bush administration spiriting many of Bin Laden's kin here in the USA out of the country immediately after 9/11. Obviously, this was for their own safety, as well as for keeping Saudi Arabian interests happy. Let's face it, the Bush-Saudi connection was a very strong one.
They say "politics makes for strange bedfellows." There are very real reasons why Bush invaded Iraq instead of the 9/11 terrorists' home nation, Saudi Arabia.
2 guys holding hands is only Un-Gay when:
A. Shaking hands
B. Helping someone up
C. if they other guy is feeble and/or weak.
and that don't look like A,B or C to me
Quote:
And the terrorist came from what country?
so what, Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist and he was born & raised in the USA. Terrorists come from all countries, it's not the country's fault that the psycho('s) were born there.
Redneck Burning Quran
I do not see his geopolitical point, but fair is fair... actually im posting this because his accent is funny as hell..
I was sure you could not sink any lower. Then you did.
Way to BURY the bar. Here's hoping YouTube bans it.
Should youtube ban videos depicting the burning of american flags, bibles, or allow offensive pictures representing Jesus Christ? If you're going to insist on handling the muzzies with kid gloves, well, then you'd better stock up on gloves for everyone.
.
“Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet you invented. Oh, oh, the irony!” -Jon Stewart
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:I was sure you could not sink any lower. Then you did.
Way to BURY the bar. Here's hoping YouTube bans it.
youre a tool learn how to laugh, your life cannot be that hard that you cant chuckle at people without making a less than indignant response
so did the guy actually burn the books or what?
No, he didn't. They called it off.
I work on Wall Street, but didn't force you to take out a loan you couldn't afford.
True Conservative wrote:Take Back the Republican Party wrote:I was sure you could not sink any lower. Then you did.
Way to BURY the bar. Here's hoping YouTube bans it.
youre a tool learn how to laugh, your life cannot be that hard that you cant chuckle at people without making a less than indignant response
It's very clear who's an ignorant, insensitive tool. Posting sh!t like this proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt.
My life is not so "hard" that I have some ill compulsion to "chuckle" at the pain of others. Laughing at something like this is the sign of a sick, hate-filled mind....and most likely, a much less-than fulfilling life.
Laugh away. Better you than me.
Kevin Trudeau wrote:Should youtube ban videos depicting the burning of american flags, bibles, or allow offensive pictures representing Jesus Christ? If you're going to insist on handling the muzzies with kid gloves, well, then you'd better stock up on gloves for everyone.
.
No, I do not reserve this level of consideration and concern for others' welfare for "muzzies." I'd be just as aghast at any other video depicting a scene that can result in pain for others, including American servicepeople.
However, your massive over-generalization is a seriously poor defense at this point in time, for it utterly ignores any current context. From the Vatican to the White House, our entire world was nigh unanimous in its condemnation of what the Gainesville, FL pastor was about to do. Then some bacwards-ass hick does it anyway in this vid, proving that, as a people, we still have a long way to go before we can fully understand why we anger some cultures to the point of mass-murderous retribution.
The Constitutional concept of "umlimited free speech" is a lofty ideal, not a practical definition. Sometimes, it is just plain stupid to prove how literally it can be interpreted. This is a prime example.
whatever your pious feelings on the matter may be, it is, nonetheless his right. And if the muzzies get all murderously angry over it, then I suppose it shows that they, not us, are the back-assward hicks. Its not like he actually hurt one of their kind. Heck, he didn't even pour bacon grease on it.
.
“Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet you invented. Oh, oh, the irony!” -Jon Stewart
Would we be so forgiving and understanding if Mormons worldwide became enraged and violently protested or acted out, if some dude announced he was going to burn a bunch of book of mormon? No, we would call them crazy nutjobs who needed to get over themselves and stop being so sensitive. Taunting would ensue, mormon jokes would abound, and we would just dare them to do something stupid, so we could announce to the world how extremist and nutjobby their religion is. For the muzzies, however, we may not do any such thing without signaling the pc police.
.
“Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet you invented. Oh, oh, the irony!” -Jon Stewart
Kevin Trudeau wrote:Would we be so forgiving and understanding if Mormons worldwide became enraged and violently protested or acted out, if some dude announced he was going to burn a bunch of book of mormon? No, we would call them crazy nutjobs who needed to get over themselves and stop being so sensitive. Taunting would ensue, mormon jokes would abound, and we would just dare them to do something stupid, so we could announce to the world how extremist and nutjobby their religion is. For the muzzies, however, we may not do any such thing without signaling the pc police.
.
Here is the thing - they SHOULDN'T get that mad over this kinda thing, but reality is that we know they do. Its a cultural problem in that part of the world. There are also parts of the world where Muslims WON'T do that also. Its not like Christian-based cultures haven't been there before. Its not that the Christianity changed any, but the CULTURE evolved to something far less backwards and primitive.
Generally, I'm all for offending people - people DO need to get over things I agree. But since we know they do very irrational and destructive things upon very little provocation - even if they shouldn't - its still very reckless to provoke them. No?
